Coaching Hot Seat

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

pdxduck2013
Freshman
Posts: 1431
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 5:20 pm

Re: Coaching Hot Seat

Post by pdxduck2013 »

I like the Kirby Moore move for WSU. A young, up and coming coach who is from the state of Washington, played in the PNW and has played for and coached under some very successful college coaches. His brother is also Kellen Moore. With their conference situation, I think this is probably the best case scenario for them.
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 10996
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Coaching Hot Seat

Post by buckmarkduck »

StevensTechU wrote: Thu Dec 11, 2025 4:10 pm I can't imagine Jerry, who has only ever really known Los Angeles, would have the slightest interest in Pullman.
He’s not being retained. So La is no longer an option for Jerry
pdxduck2013
Freshman
Posts: 1431
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 5:20 pm

Re: Coaching Hot Seat

Post by pdxduck2013 »

buckmarkduck wrote: Sat Dec 13, 2025 2:49 pm
StevensTechU wrote: Thu Dec 11, 2025 4:10 pm I can't imagine Jerry, who has only ever really known Los Angeles, would have the slightest interest in Pullman.
He’s not being retained. So La is no longer an option for Jerry
If Mehringer slides over to coaching QBs as OC, I wonder if Oregon could be a destination for him as a TE/co-OC.
pdxduck2013
Freshman
Posts: 1431
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 5:20 pm

Re: Coaching Hot Seat

Post by pdxduck2013 »

This got lost in the news shuffle apparently, but Sacramento State head coach Brennan Marion is the new OC at Colorado. This guy might change jobs more often than Jedd Fisch lol.
pdxduck2013
Freshman
Posts: 1431
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 5:20 pm

Re: Coaching Hot Seat

Post by pdxduck2013 »

Sarkisian just fired his DC... interesting. Would love to see Lanning snatch Pete K as the co-DC for Hampton.
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Coaching Hot Seat

Post by StevensTechU »

pdxduck2013 wrote: Thu Dec 18, 2025 4:38 pm Sarkisian just fired his DC... interesting. Would love to see Lanning snatch Pete K as the co-DC for Hampton.
Wow. Wow wow. One of the best 3 DCs in college football.
pdxduck2013
Freshman
Posts: 1431
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 5:20 pm

Re: Coaching Hot Seat

Post by pdxduck2013 »

StevensTechU wrote: Thu Dec 18, 2025 4:41 pm
pdxduck2013 wrote: Thu Dec 18, 2025 4:38 pm Sarkisian just fired his DC... interesting. Would love to see Lanning snatch Pete K as the co-DC for Hampton.
Wow. Wow wow. One of the best 3 DCs in college football.
Agreed. His fall guy for underperforming this year is...his best actual coach?
rsbgduck
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 663
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Roseburg, OR
Contact:

Re: Coaching Hot Seat

Post by rsbgduck »

pdxduck2013 wrote: Thu Dec 18, 2025 5:13 pm
StevensTechU wrote: Thu Dec 18, 2025 4:41 pm
pdxduck2013 wrote: Thu Dec 18, 2025 4:38 pm Sarkisian just fired his DC... interesting. Would love to see Lanning snatch Pete K as the co-DC for Hampton.
Wow. Wow wow. One of the best 3 DCs in college football.
Agreed. His fall guy for underperforming this year is...his best actual coach?
Was Texas’ D even the issue this year? Other than the OSU game I didn’t pay much attention to them other than the national pundits and all they bitched about was the O, particularly the lack of production from Manning. Could this be a case where Manning agreed to come back as long as they kept the OC but Sarkisian still had to fire someone for Texas way under performing this year?
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Coaching Hot Seat

Post by StevensTechU »

In 2025, Texas ranked 19th in defensive points per drive; they were 41st in offensive points per drive.

In 2024, Texas was 1st in defensive points per drive and 23rd in offensive points per drive.

My guess is internal drama, because the on-field results don't support the decision.
droop10
Freshman
Posts: 1405
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:07 am

Re: Coaching Hot Seat

Post by droop10 »

I hope to be wrong, but this feels like USC lucking into being able to snag Kwiatkowski in the event that Lynn leaves, which would be an upgrade for them.
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Coaching Hot Seat

Post by StevensTechU »

Oh this is great spin from FootballScoop. They write, without questioning the logic or sanity, that Sarkisian says he fired Kwiatkowski because Sark himself was spending too much time with the defense. Does anyone with more than one brain cell think a defense is better with more of Sark's voice and less of Kwiatkowski's? And Sark thought he needed to insert himself into the meeting room of a group that was #1 in the country in 2024 and not the group that was 23rd? Just complete nonsense.

https://www.footballscoop.com/2025/12/1 ... l-muschamp

I'm going to double down on my guess that there were interpersonal issues between Kwiatkowski and Sarkisian. I hadn't thought about the USC job, and was instead wondering if there was anything Lanning could do to bring him to Eugene, but ending up at USC would be a major bummer.
squintsdd
Senior
Posts: 2062
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:39 am

Re: Coaching Hot Seat

Post by squintsdd »

StevensTechU wrote: Fri Dec 19, 2025 1:47 pm Oh this is great spin from FootballScoop. They write, without questioning the logic or sanity, that Sarkisian says he fired Kwiatkowski because Sark himself was spending too much time with the defense. Does anyone with more than one brain cell think a defense is better with more of Sark's voice and less of Kwiatkowski's? And Sark thought he needed to insert himself into the meeting room of a group that was #1 in the country in 2024 and not the group that was 23rd? Just complete nonsense.

https://www.footballscoop.com/2025/12/1 ... l-muschamp

I'm going to double down on my guess that there were interpersonal issues between Kwiatkowski and Sarkisian. I hadn't thought about the USC job, and was instead wondering if there was anything Lanning could do to bring him to Eugene, but ending up at USC would be a major bummer.
I just don't see where kwiatkowski would take a position at Oregon unless it's the DC. Even a co-dc feels like a downgrade for him, and likely wouldn't pay him as well as a school like usc would pay him.
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Coaching Hot Seat

Post by StevensTechU »

squintsdd wrote: Fri Dec 19, 2025 1:59 pm
StevensTechU wrote: Fri Dec 19, 2025 1:47 pm Oh this is great spin from FootballScoop. They write, without questioning the logic or sanity, that Sarkisian says he fired Kwiatkowski because Sark himself was spending too much time with the defense. Does anyone with more than one brain cell think a defense is better with more of Sark's voice and less of Kwiatkowski's? And Sark thought he needed to insert himself into the meeting room of a group that was #1 in the country in 2024 and not the group that was 23rd? Just complete nonsense.

https://www.footballscoop.com/2025/12/1 ... l-muschamp

I'm going to double down on my guess that there were interpersonal issues between Kwiatkowski and Sarkisian. I hadn't thought about the USC job, and was instead wondering if there was anything Lanning could do to bring him to Eugene, but ending up at USC would be a major bummer.
I just don't see where kwiatkowski would take a position at Oregon unless it's the DC. Even a co-dc feels like a downgrade for him, and likely wouldn't pay him as well as a school like usc would pay him.
Let me dream, OK.
squintsdd
Senior
Posts: 2062
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:39 am

Re: Coaching Hot Seat

Post by squintsdd »

StevensTechU wrote: Fri Dec 19, 2025 2:11 pm
squintsdd wrote: Fri Dec 19, 2025 1:59 pm
StevensTechU wrote: Fri Dec 19, 2025 1:47 pm Oh this is great spin from FootballScoop. They write, without questioning the logic or sanity, that Sarkisian says he fired Kwiatkowski because Sark himself was spending too much time with the defense. Does anyone with more than one brain cell think a defense is better with more of Sark's voice and less of Kwiatkowski's? And Sark thought he needed to insert himself into the meeting room of a group that was #1 in the country in 2024 and not the group that was 23rd? Just complete nonsense.

https://www.footballscoop.com/2025/12/1 ... l-muschamp

I'm going to double down on my guess that there were interpersonal issues between Kwiatkowski and Sarkisian. I hadn't thought about the USC job, and was instead wondering if there was anything Lanning could do to bring him to Eugene, but ending up at USC would be a major bummer.
I just don't see where kwiatkowski would take a position at Oregon unless it's the DC. Even a co-dc feels like a downgrade for him, and likely wouldn't pay him as well as a school like usc would pay him.
Let me dream, OK.
Lol. Dream away
alxtw
Freshman
Posts: 1257
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 10:46 pm

Re: Coaching Hot Seat

Post by alxtw »

Pete K would definitely be an upgrade over Tosh. But how would he compare vs Hampton. In the fairy tale scenario Pete K comes here, we'd probably lose Hampton.

Also, Lanning is likely heavily involved and runs the defense according to his philosophies. I guessing a top DC, such as Pete K, probably would like to go to a school where he has full reign of the defense and the HC is a offense guy. (Praying Lynn stays at USC another year or two)
Post Reply