My saying we can't get anyone better is not saying he's a bad coach...That's my point...He's a good coach and an amazing recruiter...You're expecting another coach to come in and bring this caliber of player's in and it's not gonna happen...I don't understand why you hate him so much...How can you say those players wouldn't have done anything?...How do you have any clue?...And top flight NBA PG's huh?...Ridnour doesn't start and is pretty good and Aaron Brooks has been pretty good so far but I wouldn't even put him in the 2nd tier of NBA PG's let alone with top PG's.dthomas=ddixon wrote:What I'm saying is, without Rid or AB on those teams those guys woulda ended up massively underachieving. Just like the loads of talent on this team right now thats on its way to accomplishing NOTHING. Every team needs a good PG but most coaches can make due without a top flight NBA PG. Ernie can't. I feel bad for these kids. They come to our school thinking Kent is gonna coach 'em up & put them in a position to do some great things. Instead they've all degressed & gotten worse, and are nowhere near success.pudgejeff wrote:Every team needs a PG running the show...It's how it works...They make the big plays...Hit the big 3's...Make all the free throws down the stretch...It's ingrained in them from grade school...It's their job to stop the run, their job to settle the team, their job get the offense going, their job to feed the big man. Armstead does all of these things. So by you saying it's all the PG, you're saying that Freddie Jones, Luke Jackson, Anthony Norwood/Lever, James Davis, Brian Johnson, Chris Christofferson, Malik Hairston, Bryce Taylor, Maarty Leunen, Champ Oguchi, Tajuan Porter, and the rest were all meaningless and are just bums that could be replaced by anybody. Good thinking there sport.
Kent can't coach. I honestly, have no idea why you defend him. The reasons for you thinking he should stay are laughable. "We can't get anyone better." Yeah, that's a good way to go through life.
Suddenly that loss to Portland doesn't look too bad
Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
- pudgejeff
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:21 am
- GM: Sacramento Kings GM
Re: Suddenly that loss to Portland doesn't look too bad
-
duckgrad99
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 6086
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:33 pm
- Location: San Diego
Re: Suddenly that loss to Portland doesn't look too bad
I still think the ducks have the potential to do some damage in the pac-10 this season if they stay healthy. It's also encouraging that several other pac-10 teams this season don't appear to be very good. Is it asking too much for them to beat Missouri and St Mary's?

- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin

- Posts: 40516
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Suddenly that loss to Portland doesn't look too bad
UCLA is miserable. They lost to Long Beach State 79-68. They are now 2-4 and face #1 Kansas next game lol.
Btw Portland plays #8 WVU tonight. A win over them, and Portland should be in the top 25 with some big time national love.
Btw Portland plays #8 WVU tonight. A win over them, and Portland should be in the top 25 with some big time national love.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
- Elduderino
- Senior
- Posts: 2242
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:19 pm
- Location: CA
Re: Suddenly that loss to Portland doesn't look too bad
PudgeJeff, how do you know we can't bring in anyone better? How do you know that nobody else could bring in the talent that Ernie has?
Your entire argument is based off the notion that "we can't get anyone better". Quite frankly that is ludicrous and reeks of a satisfaction with mediocrity.
Your entire argument is based off the notion that "we can't get anyone better". Quite frankly that is ludicrous and reeks of a satisfaction with mediocrity.
AKA: CAgrown
-
quackattack
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:36 pm
- Location: Charleston, SC
Re: Suddenly that loss to Portland doesn't look too bad
just saw that Washington was only up 1 with 3:30 leftgofightingducks wrote:By the way Montana plays #14 Washington next so that score should be a good indicator on how bad the Montana loss was.

-
quackattack
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:36 pm
- Location: Charleston, SC
Re: Suddenly that loss to Portland doesn't look too bad
tied - 2:20 leftquackattack wrote:just saw that Washington was only up 1 with 3:30 leftgofightingducks wrote:By the way Montana plays #14 Washington next so that score should be a good indicator on how bad the Montana loss was.
our 2 loses are still bad considering the way we played, but who we lost to isn't looking as bad at this point

-
duckgrad99
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 6086
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:33 pm
- Location: San Diego
Re: Suddenly that loss to Portland doesn't look too bad
quackattack wrote:tied - 2:20 leftquackattack wrote:just saw that Washington was only up 1 with 3:30 leftgofightingducks wrote:By the way Montana plays #14 Washington next so that score should be a good indicator on how bad the Montana loss was.
our 2 loses are still bad considering the way we played, but who we lost to isn't looking as bad at this point
Washington only won by 4, but the point is that they won. Oregon always seems to be terrible in close games. Portland is down big at the half to West Virginia.

-
quackattack
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:36 pm
- Location: Charleston, SC
Re: Suddenly that loss to Portland doesn't look too bad
montana with a near upset at wash and portland with a blowout at ucla and victory over #16 minn goes to show that these aren't cupcake teams. of course a loss isn't what we want, but sometimes losses look better when you see the teams vs other competitionduckgrad99 wrote: Washington only won by 4, but the point is that they won. Oregon always seems to be terrible in close games. Portland is down big at the half to West Virginia.

- pudgejeff
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:21 am
- GM: Sacramento Kings GM
Re: Suddenly that loss to Portland doesn't look too bad
I don't think so at all...As long as we have a healthy TP and Big Mike we should very much be in both of those games...I just wish we had a few more shooters/basketball players and a few less athletes.duckgrad99 wrote:I still think the ducks have the potential to do some damage in the pac-10 this season if they stay healthy. It's also encouraging that several other pac-10 teams this season don't appear to be very good. Is it asking too much for them to beat Missouri and St Mary's?
-
duckgrad99
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 6086
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:33 pm
- Location: San Diego
Re: Suddenly that loss to Portland doesn't look too bad
After getting destroyed by Washington and Stanford, TK's Portland State Vikings defeat Portland tonight.

- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin

- Posts: 40516
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Suddenly that loss to Portland doesn't look too bad
Ya is it wrong to kinda root against my school? I kinda like to see a Portland school stay in the top 25 even if it isn't the school I go to.duckgrad99 wrote:After getting destroyed by Washington and Stanford, TK's Portland State Vikings defeat Portland tonight.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
-
duckgrad99
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 6086
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:33 pm
- Location: San Diego
Re: Suddenly that loss to Portland doesn't look too bad
Portland lost by 20 tonight to Idaho. I think it's officially a bad loss. Also, Montana lost at home yesterday to Northern Colorado.

- Diehardduckfan
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 3:36 am